About GALERI

Introduction: The Need for a New Development Paradigm

In the wake of unprecedented global challenges ranging from climate change and income inequality to biodiversity loss and social unrest, it has become increasingly evident that our current economic systems are inadequate in addressing the complexities of the modern world. The prevailing paradigm, characterized by relentless pursuit of GDP growth and profit maximization, has led to a myriad of systemic issues that threaten the stability and sustainability of our societies.

As we stand at a critical juncture in human history, it is imperative to put greater emphasis on tackling the root causes of our developmental and environmental challenges and explore alternative economic frameworks that prioritize the well-being of both people and the planet. As universally recognized through the adoption of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development, and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, the need for a new economic paradigm—one that transcends traditional notions of prosperity and progress—is more pressing than ever.

From redefining metrics of success to promoting equitable distribution of resources and fostering regenerative practices, the case for a new economic paradigm is grounded in principles of sustainability, justice, and resilience. By challenging entrenched assumptions and embracing aspirations for transformative change, we have the opportunity to forge a future that is not only prosperous but also equitable and sustainable for generations to come.

Life Economies: A Pathway for Sustainable Growth and Development

In recognition of the urgency of embracing a more holistic and inclusive vision of economic and social development, in June 2023, at their meeting in Varanasi, the Development Ministers of the G20 endorsed the ‘G20 High Level Principles on Lifestyles for Sustainable Development’, with nine principles covering the integration of development and climate agendas. The adoption of the Varanasi Principles has been a milestone in global consensus building around advancing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the SDGs.

The adoption by the G20 of this ambitious and integrated framework reflects a growing awareness across many countries of how the choices made by individuals, businesses and governments impact the wellbeing of society and the sustainability of the planet. This has created demand for, and fueled innovation toward, a new development paradigm – the ‘Life Economy’ – that is not just about economic growth, but growth that enhances wellbeing and is environment friendly and socially inclusive.

Life Economies are economic systems in which production, consumption, finance, employment and other economic activities and relations not only minimize harm but advance social and environmental objectives, delivering inclusive and sustainable growth, foster equity between current and future generations, and protect the natural environment that nurtures biodiversity and enhances well-being of people and the planet.

Life Economies encompass a wide range of alternative economic approaches that have been emerging over the past few decades aiming to recouple development progress with better outcomes for society and the planet. Examples include Bioeconomy, Blue Economy, Care Economy, Creative Economy, Circular Economy, Conscious Capitalism, Doughnut Economics, Frugal Innovation Economy, Green Economy, Impact Economy, Inclusive Capitalism, New Economy, Next Economy, Regenerative Economics, Social Solidarity Economy, Stakeholder Capitalism, Sustainable Economy, and Wellbeing Economy, among others (see Annex A for some examples).

At their core, Life Economies seek to redefine economic relations, activities, and organizations to align with principles of environmental stewardship and social justice, thereby fostering a regenerative and inclusive approach to development. Implemented effectively, a Life Economy should encourage and enable a shift in values, mindsets and behaviours on the part of individuals, businesses, investors, and institutions that lead to progress on the SDGs, without contributing to backsliding.

Characteristics of Life Economies

Life Economies have distinctive understandings about key aspects of economic relations and activities that contrast starkly with those of mainstream economies.

Sustainable Growth: In orthodox economics, the primary focus is often on achieving continuous economic growth as a measure of progress. However, Life Economies prioritize sustainability, emphasizing the need to maintain ecological balance and ensure the well-being of current and future generations, even if it means reimagining the nature of growth.
Well-being and Quality of Life: While orthodox economics tends to equate prosperity with material wealth and GDP per capita, Life Economies broaden the definition of success to include measures of well-being, social cohesion, and quality of life. This shift highlights the importance of non-material factors such as health, education, and community resilience in determining societal progress.
Regenerative Practices: Orthodox economics often overlooks the ecological impacts of production and consumption, prioritizing efficiency and profit maximization. In contrast, Life Economies advocate for regenerative practices that restore and replenish natural resources, minimize waste, and promote biodiversity conservation. This entails rethinking production methods, land use patterns, and resource management strategies to ensure long-term environmental sustainability.
Equity and Social Justice: While orthodox economics emphasizes market efficiency and individual utility maximization, Life Economies prioritize equity and social justice, seeking to reduce inequalities and ensure fair distribution of resources and opportunities. This involves addressing systemic barriers to access, advocating for inclusive policies, and empowering marginalized communities to participate in decision-making processes.
Community and Solidarity: Orthodox economics often assumes individuals to be rational actors driven by self-interest, leading to a focus on individualistic behaviour and market competition. In contrast, Life Economies emphasize the importance of community and solidarity, recognizing the interconnectedness of human relationships and the collective responsibility towards common goods. This entails fostering cooperative networks, supporting social enterprises, and valuing collaborative efforts to address shared challenges.
Long-Term Thinking: Orthodox economics tends to prioritize short-term gains and immediate returns on investment, often neglecting the long-term consequences of economic activities. Life Economies advocate for a more holistic and forward-thinking approach, considering the intergenerational impacts of decisions and investments. This involves adopting a precautionary principle, planning for resilience, and investing in sustainable infrastructure and practices that safeguard the well-being of future generations.
Holistic Measures of Success: While orthodox economics relies heavily on GDP growth as a primary indicator of economic performance, Life Economies advocate for the use of holistic measures that capture the multi-dimensional nature of well-being and progress. The Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is an example of an alternative metric, which accounts for social, environmental, and economic factors, providing a more comprehensive assessment of societal welfare beyond monetary transactions.

By embracing such concepts, Life Economies offer a transformative vision for economic development that extends conventional wisdom and seeks to create a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient world.

Emerging Building Blocks of Life Economies

Firms are the building blocks of the economy. They create jobs, provide goods and services that enhance quality of life, fuel innovation, and generate the taxes and philanthropic capital that finance governments and philanthropy. Thus, a Life Economy that fosters truly sustainable and inclusive development must be comprised of firms that deliver such outcomes. There is a widespread conviction that the social and ecological goals enshrined in the SDGs can only be achieved with the engagement of the private sector, which creates nine out of ten jobs even in poor countries. Yet, today most businesses are designed first and foremost to maximize financial returns, often generating harmful social and environmental externalities that hamper, or even reverse, progress on the SDGs.

Over the past few decades, however, new models of enterprise have emerged, dedicated primarily to social and environmental objectives. Broadly referred to as “purpose-driven” or “for-benefit” enterprises, these include social enterprises, sustainable businesses, cooperatives, public benefit corporations, community development banks, community interest companies, and numerous other models. In their pursuit of serving the common good, they have been supported by innovations in public policy, sustainable finance, sustainable production and consumption, impact measurement, and responsible management. Impact investing, wellbeing measurement, new corporate forms, circular economy, ESG, venture philanthropy, and blended finance are examples of innovations supporting the shift to for-benefit business.

For-benefit enterprises and the ecosystem innovations that support them are at the core of the Life Economy. Every year, millions of for-benefit enterprises are launched around the world aiming to deliver healthy food, affordable healthcare and housing, quality education, environmentally friendly transportation and energy, digital access, social services, water and sanitation, financial services, and more to billions of consumers eager to make choices aligned with their values. They offer quality jobs, pay taxes, make investments, and create innovative new products and services in areas often ignored or under-prioritized by traditional markets.

Major challenges to the growth of these enterprises remain, however, as they are often restricted by the current dichotomy of for-profit businesses and non-profit organizations and the ‘either-or’ mindsets of governments, investors, and other stakeholders. This affects their legal registration, ability to raise capital, access to government programs, ability to uphold their mission and values, and much more. Unleashing the Life Economy’s potential requires building an enabling environment for for-benefit enterprises, with conducive government policies, supportive financial mechanisms, uniform reporting standards, and other measures that level the playing field for these enterprises.

There are encouraging global developments already taking shape, with every member of the G20 having instituted some form of domestic legal framework that facilitates for-benefit enterprises, along with many other countries, including Colombia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Sri Lanka.

New legal frameworks enabling for-benefit enterprise

Poised for Significant Growth

A global expansion of Life Economies would accelerate the transition to a sustainable, equitable and inclusive development paradigm. There are encouraging indicators that this transition is already in progress:

The Global Commons Survey 2021 found that among G20 countries, 74% of people support the idea that their country’s economic priorities move beyond profit and increasing wealth to focus more on human well-being and ecological protection.
According to the 2022 Global State of Social Enterprise report by the British Council and Social Enterprise UK, an estimated 11 million businesses across the world could be recognized as social enterprises.
According to the Global Sustainability Study 2021, 85% of people worldwide indicate that they have made minor to significant shifts towards being more sustainable in their consumption in the past five years.
Already in 2017, the Business & Sustainable Development Commission suggested that sustainable business models could open economic opportunities worth up to US$12 trillion and increase employment by up to 380 million jobs by 2030.
A 2020 British Council report on social enterprise and job creation estimated that the number of jobs directly created by social enterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa ranged from 28 million to 41 million.
In 2022, the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) estimated the size of the worldwide impact investing market to be $1.16 trillion.
According to Forrester, global green finance saw record growth in 2021, exceeding $720 billion.

Advancing Policy Coherence through the Life Economy

SDG Target 17.14 calls on all countries to enhance policy coherence for sustainable development as an essential means of implementation of the SDGs. This means ensuring that different government policies are aligned with and supportive of each other to achieve sustainable development outcomes across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. The need for coherence with sustainable development objectives is not limited to domestic policies but necessitates coordination and cooperation at a global scale.

Governments, philanthropy, civil society, and the private sector have been collaborating in myriad national and international processes and institutions ranging from the fight against climate change to development cooperation and financing for development. Some of these efforts have resulted in considerable progress towards more sustainability in the current global economic system. However, these efforts are often disparate with insufficient cross-cutting coordination and collaboration among them, contributing to a lack of policy coherence for sustainable development.

To succeed at their intended outcomes, each of these efforts ultimately needs to overcome the shortcomings of our legacy economic systems, which are inherently not designed for, or capable of delivering, sustainable development. This core challenge can be addressed by incorporating Life Economies – which are inherently designed to integrate development and sustainability – into these processes and institutions as a complementary strategy. A holistic and cross-cutting focus on enabling and harnessing Life Economies would improve policy coherence and foster synergies across these efforts, both at the domestic and international levels.

The Life Economy can foster coherence and coordination in existing processes and institutions contributing to sustainable development

Aligning Development Finance with the SDGs Through Life Economies

Development finance, whether provided by governments, international institutions, or philanthropic organizations, must play a catalytic role in promoting Life Economies. However, while encouraging steps have been made in recent years to align development finance with the SDGs, significant challenges and conflicts of objectives remain.[1] Growing Life Economies will address such misalignments by shifting trillions towards responsible corporate conduct and entrepreneurship, decent labor standards, clean technologies and energy sources, and sustainable consumption in keeping with the wellbeing of all people and the priorities of countries regardless of their state of economic and social development.[2] This shift will only be possible if all committed stakeholders work together.

From Principles to Action: Role of the G20 in Growing Life Economies

The adoption of the G20 High-Level Principles on Lifestyles for Sustainable Development provides a basis for a move to action. The G20 could leverage the past decades of innovation and the shifts in the demands of citizens, consumers, managers, employees, investors, social entrepreneurs and youth to accelerate the growth of Life Economies and scale their contributions. Based on experience and expertise gained across its member countries, the G20 may encourage and support governments worldwide in creating regulatory and policy environments, financial mechanisms, incentive structures, impact measurement and reporting standards, and other factors conducive to levelling the playing field for Life Economies.

Doing so would have significant implications for addressing a range of critical, inter-related issues where the Life Economy can unlock new solution pathways, including:

Reforming the global financial architecture
Transforming trade and value chains
Sustainable and resilient infrastructure
Scaling entrepreneurship and employment
Coupling technology and innovation with sustainable development
Sustainable consumption and production
Promoting women-led development
People-centric and inclusive governance
Aligning development finance with the SDGs
Climate change and biodiversity loss
Sustainable food systems
Integrated and holistic health systems
Policy coherence for sustainable development

Key Policies and Institutions to Promote Life Economies

The key challenge facing the G20 and the global community is to develop robust enabling ecosystems to accelerate the growth and ensure the accountability of Life Economies. Under last year’s Indian G20 Presidency, crucial momentum was generated in this direction. To facilitate and accelerate the expansion of Life Economies, an action plan may be formulated during the Brazilian G20 Presidency and implemented under the leadership of subsequent G20 Presidencies. The plan could build on policy reform efforts already undertaken by all G20 members as well as by non-G20 countries. Elements could include:

Co-construction Space for Life Economies: Establishing collaborative platforms where stakeholders from diverse sectors can co-create and co-design initiatives to promote Life Economies. This space facilitates dialogue, knowledge exchange, and collective decision-making to ensure that policies and practices align with the principles of sustainability and well-being.
Community of Practice of Life Economies: Fostering networks of practitioners, researchers, policymakers, and civil society actors engaged in advancing Life Economies. This community serves as a hub for sharing best practices, conducting joint research, and promoting policy reforms favourable to the growth of Life Economies.
Regulatory and Legal Frameworks for Life Economies: Developing robust legal frameworks that provide clarity, incentives, and safeguards for businesses and organizations operating within the realm of Life Economies. These regulations should promote transparency, accountability, and social and environmental responsibility while fostering innovation and entrepreneurship.
Policies and Plans to Promote Life Economies: Formulating comprehensive policies and strategic plans that address barriers faced by Life Economies and prioritize investments in Life Economy initiatives. This includes creation of capacity within government to lead and monitor efforts to promote Life Economies, targeted interventions to support small-scale producers and for-benefit enterprises, and incentives for green innovation and community-led development projects.
Supporting Organizations for Life Economies: Building a supportive ecosystem of organizations, including government agencies, non-profit organizations, research institutions, and development partners, dedicated to advancing Life Economies. These entities provide technical assistance, capacity-building, and financial resources to facilitate the implementation of Life Economies initiatives at local, national, and international levels.
Education and Capacity Building for Life Economies: Promoting awareness and building the capacity of stakeholders across various sectors through education and training programs focused on Life Economies principles and practices. This includes integrating Life Economies into formal education curricula, as well as providing skills development opportunities for entrepreneurs, investors, policymakers and other stakeholders.
Finance for Life Economies: Mobilizing financial resources from public and private sources to support investments in Life Economy projects and enterprises. This may involve developing innovative financing mechanisms, such as impact investing, SDG-aligned development finance, green bonds, and microfinance, tailored to the specific needs and challenges of Life Economies initiatives.
Markets for Life Economies: Creating conducive market conditions that incentivize sustainable consumption and production patterns, as well as facilitate the uptake of ethically and environmentally responsible products and services. This includes promoting certification schemes, consumer awareness campaigns, and supply chain transparency initiatives to drive demand for Life Economy goods and services.
Awareness Raising and Advocacy for Life Economies: Engaging in public outreach and advocacy efforts to raise awareness about the importance of Life Economies and mobilize support for policy reforms and collective action. This involves leveraging media channels, social networks, and grassroots movements to amplify the voice of Life Economies advocates and promote transformative change.
Statistics, Data Collection, and Research on Life Economies: Developing data collection, research, and monitoring mechanisms to map and understand Life Economies, identify best practices across sectors and geographies, and assess the impact of Life Economy initiatives towards sustainable development goals. This includes developing standardized indicators, conducting impact evaluations, and sharing knowledge and insights through research publications and policy briefs.
Monitoring and Review System: Establishing a robust monitoring and review system to guide priority setting and public policy making, track the implementation of Life Economies policies and initiatives, evaluate their effectiveness, and identify areas for improvement. This involves setting up performance metrics, conducting regular evaluations, and fostering accountability and transparency in decision-making processes.

By addressing these key areas of policies and institutions, the G20 create an enabling environment for Life Economies to thrive, promoting sustainable development, social equity, and environmental resilience on a global scale.

Annex A – Examples of Life Economy Approaches

Some examples of Life Economy approaches which are already conceptualized and practiced in different parts of the world include:

Bioeconomy - The Bioeconomy involves using biological resources, processes, and principles to sustainably produce food, energy, and industrial goods, aiming to replace fossil-based resources with renewable biological ones.
Bioregionalism - Bioregionalism promotes living within the natural capacities and limits of local ecosystems, emphasizing sustainability by aligning economic activities with the ecological characteristics of natural regions rather than political boundaries.
Blue Economy - The Blue Economy utilizes ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods, and jobs while preserving the health of ocean ecosystems, focusing on sustainable maritime industries and marine conservation.
Care Economy - The Care Economy values and prioritizes care work and services, recognizing their fundamental role in sustaining society and the economy, and promoting policies that support care workers and caregiving activities.
Circular Economy - The Circular Economy aims to design out waste and pollution, keep products and materials in use for as long as possible, and regenerate natural systems, creating a closed-loop system that minimizes resource extraction and environmental impact.
Conscious Capitalism - Conscious Capitalism advocates for a more ethical and sustainable form of capitalism where businesses operate with a higher purpose, prioritizing the welfare of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the environment, alongside profits.
Creative Economy - The Creative Economy centers on the economic contributions of creative industries such as arts, culture, and innovation, leveraging creativity and knowledge to drive sustainable economic growth and development.
Doughnut Economics - Doughnut Economics, proposed by Kate Raworth, balances essential human needs with planetary boundaries, aiming to create a safe and just space for humanity that ensures social equity while staying within ecological limits.
Frugal Innovation Economy - The Frugal Innovation Economy emphasizes creating affordable, accessible, and sustainable solutions by optimizing the use of limited resources, focusing on innovation that meets the needs of underserved populations and promotes resource efficiency.
Green Economy - The Green Economy seeks sustainable development without degrading the environment, aiming to reduce carbon emissions, enhance resource efficiency, and prevent the loss of biodiversity while promoting economic growth.
Impact Economy - The Impact Economy focuses on investments and business practices that generate measurable positive social and environmental impacts alongside financial returns, integrating impact objectives into the core of economic activities.
Inclusive Capitalism - Inclusive Capitalism strives to make capitalism more equitable by ensuring that all stakeholders, including workers, communities, and the environment, benefit from economic activities, promoting fairness and sustainability within the capitalist system.
New Economy - The New Economy encompasses a range of emerging economic models that prioritize sustainability, equity, and well-being over traditional growth metrics, seeking to create a more resilient and just economic system.
Next Economy - Similar to the new economy, the next economy emphasizes innovative and sustainable approaches to economic development. It focuses on long-term well-being, social equity, and environmental sustainability, often incorporating technological advancements and new business models.
Permaculture Economics - Permaculture Economics applies permaculture principles to economic systems, focusing on sustainable agriculture, land use, and community self-reliance, promoting practices that are ecologically sound and socially just.
Regenerative Economy - The Regenerative Economy emphasizes restoring and renewing ecosystems, enhancing community resilience, and promoting equitable economic opportunities, focusing on creating systems that are regenerative by design.
Sharing Economy - The Sharing Economy is based on shared access to goods and services, promoting the efficient use of resources through collaborative consumption and peer-to-peer exchange, often facilitated by digital platforms.
Social and Solidarity Economy - The Social and Solidarity Economy focuses on social objectives and solidarity, incorporating democratic governance, ethical values, and community well-being into economic activities, prioritizing people and the planet over profits.
Stakeholder Capitalism - Stakeholder Capitalism advocates for a model where companies serve the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the community, rather than focusing solely on maximizing shareholder value.
Steady-State Economy - The Steady-State Economy promotes an economic system with a stable or mildly fluctuating size, focusing on sustainability and the well-being of all citizens without relying on constant economic growth.
Sustainable Economy - The Sustainable Economy prioritizes long-term sustainability by balancing economic growth with environmental stewardship and social equity, aiming to meet present needs without compromising future generations.
Wellbeing Economy - The Wellbeing Economy prioritizes human and ecological wellbeing over mere economic growth, aiming for a fair distribution of resources and opportunities, and measuring success through well-being metrics rather than traditional economic indicators

Annex B: Measuring Performance of Life Economies

To measure the performance of Life Economies, we need innovative indicators that offer a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of economic activities, relations, and performance, capturing the multidimensional nature of well-being, sustainability, and human development. By incorporating these indicators into policy formulation and decision-making processes, policymakers can better assess the impact of economic policies and initiatives on society, the environment, and future generations. There are already a number of alternative frameworks to draw from, including:

Social Return on Investment (SROI): SROI measures the social, environmental, and economic value generated by an investment or activity, taking into account factors such as job creation, community empowerment, and environmental conservation. Unlike traditional financial metrics, SROI captures the broader societal benefits and costs associated with economic activities, providing a more comprehensive assessment of their impact on well-being and sustainability.
Ecological Footprint: The ecological footprint measures the amount of biologically productive land and water required to sustain a population or economic activity, taking into account resource consumption and waste generation. By quantifying the environmental impact of economic activities, the ecological footprint highlights the need for resource efficiency, conservation, and sustainable management practices to ensure the long-term health of ecosystems and biodiversity.
Inclusive Wealth Index (IWI): The Inclusive Wealth Index measures the total wealth of a nation, including natural, human, and produced capital, as well as social and institutional capital. Unlike GDP, which only measures economic output, the IWI provides a more holistic assessment of a country's wealth and well-being, considering factors such as education, health, and social cohesion. By valuing non-market goods and services, the IWI encourages policymakers to prioritize investments that enhance human development and social equity.
Gender Equity Index (GEI): The Gender Equity Index measures the extent of gender disparities in economic participation, education, health, and political empowerment. By highlighting the unequal distribution of resources and opportunities between men and women, the GEI underscores the importance of gender equality as a driver of sustainable development and social progress. Closing gender gaps in employment, education, and political representation can lead to greater economic efficiency, social cohesion, and human development.
Happiness Index: The Happiness Index measures subjective well-being and life satisfaction, capturing people's perceptions of their quality of life and overall happiness. By focusing on individual experiences and emotions, rather than purely economic factors, the Happiness Index provides insights into the factors that contribute to people's sense of fulfilment and contentment. Investing in social support networks, mental health services, and community engagement can enhance overall happiness and resilience, leading to healthier and more vibrant societies.
Environmental Quality Index (EQI): The Environmental Quality Index measures the state of the environment, including air and water quality, biodiversity, and habitat conservation. By tracking environmental indicators, such as pollution levels and ecosystem health, the EQI provides a comprehensive assessment of the impact of economic activities on natural resources and ecosystems. Investing in environmental conservation, renewable energy, and sustainable agriculture can improve environmental quality and enhance long-term sustainability.
Cultural Diversity Index (CDI): The Cultural Diversity Index measures the richness and diversity of cultural expressions within a society, including language, religion, art, and traditions. By valuing cultural diversity as a source of creativity, innovation, and social cohesion, the CDI highlights the importance of preserving and promoting cultural heritage and identity. Investing in cultural education, heritage conservation, and intercultural dialogue can enrich societies and foster greater understanding and tolerance among diverse communities.
Sustainable Development Performance Indicators (SDPI): The Sustainable Development Performance Index (SDPI) offers a distinct alternative to the mainstream Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) indicators commonly used in assessing corporate and investment performance. Unlike traditional ESG metrics, which primarily focus on corporate behavior and risk management, the SDPI takes a more holistic approach by integrating a broader set of sustainability criteria. The SDPI evaluates not only the environmental impact and social responsibility of businesses but also their contributions to broader sustainable development goals, such as poverty reduction, gender equality, and inclusive economic growth. By prioritizing sustainable development outcomes over short-term financial returns, the SDPI encourages businesses and investors to adopt more comprehensive and forward-thinking strategies that address the complex challenges facing society and the planet.
Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI): The Genuine Progress Indicator adjusts GDP by accounting for factors such as income distribution, environmental degradation, and social costs, providing a more accurate measure of economic welfare. By incorporating non-market goods and services, as well as negative externalities, the GPI offers a more holistic assessment of societal well-being and sustainable development.
Human Development Index (HDI): The Human Development Index combines indicators of income, education, and health to measure overall human well-being and quality of life. Unlike GDP, which focuses solely on economic output, the HDI considers broader dimensions of development, including access to education, healthcare, and basic living standards, providing a more comprehensive measure of human progress.
Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW): The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare builds upon the concept of the GPI by incorporating additional indicators of sustainability, such as resource depletion, environmental pollution, and social inequality. By accounting for the long-term impacts of economic activity on natural resources and social well-being, the ISEW offers a more holistic assessment of economic welfare and sustainability.
Bhutan's Gross National Happiness (GNH) Index: Bhutan's Gross National Happiness Index measures national well-being based on nine domains, including psychological well-being, health, education, and environmental conservation. By prioritizing holistic well-being and spiritual values over material wealth, the GNH Index offers a unique alternative to GDP that reflects Bhutan's commitment to sustainable and equitable development

Annex C: Future Research on Life Economies

To establish a more sophisticated policy and practice framework for Life Economies, more research on Life Economies is needed. Key areas include:

Emerging Trends and Challenges: Identify emerging trends and challenges within the field of Life Economies that warrant further investigation. This could include topics such as the scaling-up of sustainable practices, the integration of social and environmental objectives into business models, or the role of technology in advancing Life Economies.
Research Gaps: Highlight existing gaps in knowledge and understanding related to Life Economies that could be addressed through future research. This could involve areas such as the impact of Life Economy policies and initiatives on poverty alleviation, on promoting sustainable economic development, or on driving consumer behaviour towards more sustainable lifestyles.
Methodological Innovations: Explore opportunities for methodological innovations and interdisciplinary approaches in studying Life Economies. This could involve incorporating new data sources, developing novel metrics and indicators, or applying cutting-edge analytical techniques to assess the complex dynamics of economic relations and activities within Life Economies.
Policy Implications: Consider the policy implications of research findings on Life Economies and their potential implications for decision-making at local, national, and global levels. This could include recommendations for policy reforms, institutional changes, or investment strategies aimed at promoting sustainable and inclusive economic development.
Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Explore cross-cultural perspectives on Life Economies and examine how different cultural, social, and institutional contexts shape economic relations and activities. This could involve comparative studies of Life Economies initiatives in diverse regions and countries, as well as analyses of cultural values and norms that influence attitudes towards sustainability and well-being.
Stakeholder Engagement: Emphasize the importance of stakeholder engagement and participatory approaches in shaping the research agenda on Life Economies. This could involve partnerships with civil society organizations, businesses, government agencies, practitioner networks and local communities to co-design research projects, co-produce knowledge, and co-create solutions to pressing sustainability challenges.
Long-Term Sustainability: Consider the long-term sustainability of Life Economies initiatives and explore strategies for ensuring their resilience and scalability over time. This could involve research on the drivers of change in economic systems, the role of social movements and collective action in driving transformative change, and the potential trade-offs and synergies between different dimensions of sustainability.

Our coasts and beaches are irreplaceable. Let’s save them.

Our Mission

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It’s easy. Just click “Edit Text” or double click me to add your own content and make changes to the font. Feel free to drag and drop me anywhere you like on your page. I’m a great place for you to tell a story and let your users know a little more about you.

This is a great space to write a long text about your company and your services. You can use this space to go into a little more detail about your company. Talk about your team and what services you provide. Tell your visitors the story of how you came up with the idea for your business and what makes you different from your competitors. Make your company stand out and show your visitors who you are.

About GALERI

Our coasts and beaches are irreplaceable. Let’s save them.

Our Mission

Our Vision